Register  |  Login  |  Literary T-Shirt Store  |    
The Book of Urizen (Your Reason) by William Blake, published as an illuminated manuscript
Random Book Title

A random title for your next blockbuster novel or Pulitzer Prize short story:
What to Expect When Your Expecting Beelzebub's Baby

Recent Comments Minimize

"@Mohamed, let me know what you think. The editing is great. However, the acting not so much, with the exception possibly of Eugene Roche." Read more
by Unpublished Guy on When Movies are Better than Books

"Being that "Slaughterhouse 5" is one of my favorite novels of all time, I can't imagine a movie being better than the book. That said, I thought that the movie adaptation of "Mother Night" was pretty darn good! Based on your recommendation, I'll give the S-5 movie a look." Read more
by Mohamed Mughal on When Movies are Better than Books

"@lilrut, I've averaged 0 stories a year for the past 10 years. I'm hoping to increase that average to .000001 or thereabouts." Read more
by Unpublished Guy on 8 Creative Writing Tips to Slow Write Your Story into Oblivion

"Mientras soy completamente aficionado a mi propio litro del aguacate, no pienso que yo permitiría que ello me siguiera sobre como un cachorro, nunca haciendo caso esto es la ampliación posible y el encogimiento de capacidades." Read more
by Sue on Murdering My Creative Writing Muse with Seven Random Words from Dictionary

Links for Readers and Writers
 

Writing and Publishing Fiction


Nearly serious fiction related diversions for the casual or more active writer.

Obligatory Statistically Invalid Online Poll Minimize
What did you expect to find on this blog, anyway?



Submit Survey  View Results
Unpublished Guy Blogs

Plagiarism Is Obvious, Isn’t It

Posted by: Unpublished Guy on 2/3/2009

When Vladimir Nabokov was asked whether he had read Franz Kafka’s The Trial before writing Invitation to a Beheading, Nabokov insisted that he had not. Having read Invitation to a Beheading, the basic premise is so similar—a man awaits execution for a crime that is never made clear—it is difficult to take his word for it. It doesn’t help that Lolita may have been intentionally or subconsciously plagiarized from a short story.

If I hadn’t had my own (possibly Jungian collective) subconscious plagiarism or influence, I would think it was fairly obvious that Nabokov had first read the trial. (Perhaps you have your own example of cryptomnesia?)

In my case I wrote a story, “Gerald Freund” while in the undergraduate writing program at Old Dominion University. It had gone through a Workshop. In that version of the story I used both first person and third person POV for a single character, Gerald Freund. You see this technique is used quite a bit these days, particularly in film, most notably in Fight Club, which was based on 1996 novel by Chuck Palahniuk.

Unlike Fight Club, the story remained rather ambiguous about the dual POV being the same person. When I mentioned that was my intent, the instructor recommended that I read I Am Not Stiller by Max Frisch. I promptly read it, and several other Max Frisch novels. He used the same technique in another novel, Gantenbein.

After a few rewrites, I decided I would have time go backward from the present to the time when the narrator was a child being carried from East to West Germany before the Iron Curtain had descended. I discussed this change to the story with a fellow writer from class, He asked me if I had read Times Arrow by Martin Amis. I said that I hadn’t. In hindsight I wonder what he must have thought about my answer, including whether I was lying.

If you have read Time’s Arrow, then you can already see how my story sounds like a copy. Time’s Arrow uses both the first person/third person POV and the time going backward techniques. Like my story, the protagonist was German. The real odd synchronicity was the name of the characters in each story. In Time’s Arrow, the protagonist was named Todd Friendly. The surname of my main character, Freund, is German for Friend.
Some subconscious influence seems to me to be a more plausible reason for these apparent plagiarist episodes. I believe that synchronicity is more likely to be confirmation bias than a connection to the collective unconscious. However, before reading the story I did not know of any author named Martin Amis. Unless I have blocked out the memory—and I can’t think of any traumatic episode that would have caused me to block out reading a particular novel—I had not read any of Amis’s stories. To my mind, I had experienced a Nabokov event, which I can only chalk up to a bizarre coincidence.

Create a trackback from your own site.

4 Comments

    • Apr 25 2009, 6:38 PM Tim Duck
    • Not sure you've quite grasped Invitation To A Beheading if you think it has the same premise as Kafka's The Trial. Analogues in terms of mood, maybe, but otherwise totally different. And it's Nabokov with two 'O's.

    • May 03 2009, 6:14 PM Unpublished Guy
    • First, I corrected the rather embarrassing misspelling of Nabokov. (Clearly, I am not a Nabokov-conversant.) From my superficial reading of The Trial (read quite a while ago) and Invitation of Beheading (not quite as long ago but still a while back), they both appeared to have a common premise. Both stories (on the surface at least) being stories about a protagonist that is accused of a crime that is not clearly explained to the accused. However, I did enjoy Invitation to a Beheading and was interested enough in your comment, Tim, to do a Google search and locate two analyses of the novel. One that grasped the story in a way similar to my initial reading and another that took quite a different take (PDF) and had more interesting things to say (no mention of The Trial at all). Perhaps, you would agree with the latter analysis, or perhaps, you have one of your own?

    • Oct 15 2009, 2:43 PM Jerry
    • People can't apply the general rule of plagiarism to fiction. It just doesn't work. Originality is subjective. If we applied the academic definition of plagiarism to fiction, most of our celebrated writers would have been excommunicated from the literary world long ago. Themes, structure and even basic situations are copied all the time. What makes these instances of "theft" acceptable in the literary world is the personal "spin" that a writer puts on these things. Are all love songs the same? Think about that.


Leave A Comment



Please enter the CAPTCHA phrase above.



Syndicate  
Most Read
Archive
Popular Tags